Given that the March 4th election in Samoa is decided by anything but policy concerns, a discussion on policy initiatives between the main parties is essentially a waste of time. People will vote according to Samoan behavioural patterns that can only be summed up by the statement: “Only In Samoa”. These patterns have been discussed before on this blog. However, if we were to analyse the policy offerings of the two main parties, HRPP and the Tautua Samoa Party (Tautua Party), what we will find is that the Tautua party is stuck between a rock and a hard place. It needs to differentiate itself from the HRPP, but the promises it makes also need to be financially credible. Like previous opposition parties desperate to get into power and grab the voters attention, they have fallen into the trap of promising big, but detailing little.
Policy highlights from the Tautua party.
- Banning any form of commercial activity on Sundays
- Take away the VAGST from everyday food items
- Raise salaries of the Police; Raise the Pension; Raise teacher salaries; Raise Doctors salaries. Raise Pulenuu salaries
- Get rid of the casino legislation
- A new abattoir to be built, as well as the establishment of an agricultural marketing authority.
Tautua party strategists are obviously banking on the voters to notice that most public sector workers will get salary rises. They have also cleverly added in salary-rises for pulenuu/sui o malo. Pulenuu / sui o malo have quite a bit of influence in the village fono and we all know the village fono are the real electors in the villages. The God on Sundays and anti-Casino proposals are clearly aimed at the old men and women in the rural villages who like anything to do with God and Sundays and who, funnily enough, happen to be in key positions of influence in their village fono and womens committees. It is these old people who tell their families who to vote for.
The TSP has decided to be tactically silent on the details of how it intends to fund its generous election promises. For an opposition party that is desperate for change in Samoa, it is a rather interesting position to take. To the question of “how”, the Tautua party answer appears to be: “we’ll tell you later”. The tactic is an admission that Samoan voters do not really look too deeply into party policies at election time.
The HRPP has come out with a continuation of its development policies that are in line with its Samoan Development Strategies of the past decade. The key focus for the HRPP if re-elected, is health and education.
In Health, the highlights include:
- Improving emergency response capabilities
- New kidney dialysis unit for
Savaii - More district hospitals and staff
- Increased support for the growth of OUM (Oceania University of Medicine)
In Education, the big-note items are an increased access for the internet and computer literacy, whilst in the agricultural sector, there will be an increased emphasis on organic farming to reduce chemicals in the food chain and in potentially harming the environment. In addition, ‘mobile abattoirs’ will be used on both islands to increase domestic production.
Pay-rises for the public sector and raises in the pension will only be in line with the cost of living and only if there is room in the budget.
The HRPP will rely on four main sources of funding to fund its election promises. 1) earnings from exports and taxes; 2) overseas aid; 3) soft-term concessionary loans; and 4) an international fund called ‘Fast Start’.
It is a typical HRPP election platform. It is ambitious without being exuberant and, the PM would argue, it is realistic and economically feasible. In reality, the HRPP policies are more circumspect because it has to keep its aid partners on side. Aid partners do not like to hear of exuberant promises at election time like what the Tautua party are promising - eg: pay rises for everyone. They especially do not like to see these types of pay-rises in the context of the disappearance of a key source of revenue - the VAGST.
This is where the Tautua party promises lack credibility. If you take away the VAGST, you are effectively getting rid of a major source of revenue for the government to spend. Most people in the country do not pay income tax, for the very good reason that they do not earn enough to pay. This is why the VAGST was introduced in the first place. So if the Tautua party takes away the VAGST, it will have to either raise income taxes on the private sector and public sector businesses and workers, or ask for more loans from overseas. It is completely unrealistic. There is simply not enough money in the kitty to fund the Tautua party promises.
Like the SDUP before it, the Tautua party’s fanciful and dreamlike promises were designed for nothing more but to win the election. The details would come later. In reality, Samoa is a developing country and all its economic policies are developmental. Any new government coming to power would be forced by economic circumstances to follow along with what the previous government has done - rely on overseas aid and overseas remittances, whilst trying to use that aid and remittance streams and small tax base to come up with new industries to increase investment and earnings.
No comments:
Post a Comment